Hedera drew notice from two major institutions in July 2026. Both bodies sit far from crypto marketing hype. First, the Financial Action Task Force published its DeFi report. That report examines how anti-money-laundering rules reach decentralised finance. DeFi total value locked now nears 86.6 billion dollars. Yet 132 of 142 surveyed countries still identify no qualifying arrangements. Then HM Treasury named Hedera a live tokenization benchmark for Britain. Together, the two references land within weeks of each other. As a result, Hedera gains rare institutional visibility this month. The sections below unpack both mentions in turn.
Hedera’s DeFi stack framework anchors the analysis
Regulators need a shared map before they can supervise DeFi. Accordingly, the FATF DeFi report builds its map on a layered model called the DeFi stack. That model splits the ecosystem into distinct functional layers. Importantly, the report footnotes Hedera’s own educational explainer as the source. Hedera’s material describes five layers, from settlement up to aggregation. FATF then applies its Standards differently to each layer. Therefore, Hedera’s framework shapes how the report reasons throughout. This is a quiet but meaningful role for one network’s educational work.
Hedera named as core settlement infrastructure
The settlement layer sits at the base of the stack. It records transactions and provides consensus and final settlement. Here, FATF lists Ethereum, Solana, and Hedera as examples. Each one anchors financial activity built in higher layers. Importantly, FATF generally keeps this layer outside its Standards. The rules apply only when a person there provides VASP services. So base blockchains face little direct obligation under the report. This treatment reflects FATF’s technology-neutral, function-based approach.
HBAR appears at the asset layer
The asset layer covers tokens that represent value onchain. Here, FATF names ETH, SOL, and HBAR as native-token examples. These assets secure their networks and move through DeFi protocols. However, the Standards target persons who provide token services, not the tokens. Consequently, a native asset alone does not trigger regulation. FATF instead focuses on issuers, exchanges, and controllers. HBAR therefore appears as a neutral technical example. The report attaches no risk label to it.
Hedera stays out of the report’s risk sections
The report devotes long sections to illicit finance risks. It details fraud, ransomware, and proliferation financing cases. Named examples include Drift Protocol, KelpDAO, and Forsage. In contrast, Solana, Ethereum, Tron, and Binance Smart Chain appear in these cases. However, Hedera appears in none of them. No exploit, laundering route, or enforcement action involves the network. Its only mentions stay structural and educational. That absence is itself a notable signal for readers.
A second UK report names Hedera as a tokenization benchmark
Institutional recognition of Hedera extends beyond the FATF report. In July 2026, HM Treasury received its Wholesale Digital Markets Champion report. Chris Woolard led that review for the UK government. Notably, the report highlights Hedera as a live tokenization case study. In July 2025, Lloyds Banking Group, Aberdeen Investments, and Archax settled trades on the network. Those were the UK’s first FX trades using tokenized real-world assets as collateral. The collateral included tokenized money market fund units and UK gilts. Additionally, a 54-firm taskforce backs the wider effort, including BlackRock and Fidelity. Officials project 33 billion pounds in annual output by 2035.
Why the control test matters most
FATF’s central test asks who controls a DeFi arrangement. Control or sufficient influence brings an arrangement into scope. The report lists onchain signals like admin keys and upgrade rights. Additionally, it lists offchain signals like front-ends and foundations. Governance-token concentration can also reveal hidden control. Truly decentralised arrangements fall outside the Standards. Yet FATF still urges risk mitigation for those cases. For any network, the framing separates base technology from human control.
The takeaway for the Hedera ecosystem
Two major institutions cited Hedera within weeks of each other. Neither one endorses the network outright. Still, their choices reveal how policymakers view infrastructure. FATF treated Hedera’s framework as a reliable reference. Meanwhile, HM Treasury pointed to Hedera for live tokenization at scale. Both reports also kept the network clear of every risk typology. For observers, that combination reads as a steady, low-friction signal. Now the harder scrutiny falls on controllers and front-ends.
*Disclaimer: News content provided by Genfinity is intended solely for informational purposes. While we strive to deliver accurate and up-to-date information, we do not offer financial or legal advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with qualified professionals before making any financial or legal decisions. Genfinity disclaims any responsibility for actions taken based on the information presented in our articles. Our commitment is to share knowledge, foster discussion, and contribute to a better understanding of the topics covered in our articles. We advise our readers to exercise caution and diligence when seeking information or making decisions based on the content we provide.
