A recent supervisory communication from the Federal Reserve regarding the utilization of dollar tokens, specifically stablecoins, has ignited controversy among members of Congress. On Monday, August 28th, the Federal Reserve issued a set of guidelines for state member banks, requiring them to obtain written supervisory nonobjection before engaging in any activities involving dollar tokens. While the Federal Reserve’s intentions are to ensure effective risk management practices, some members of Congress view these actions as hindering their efforts to establish stablecoin regulations.

Federal Reserve’s Guidelines for Dollar Tokens

The Federal Reserve’s guidelines aim to establish a framework for banks dealing with dollar tokens. Banks are now required to seek written supervisory nonobjection from the Federal Reserve before issuing, possessing, or engaging in transactions involving dollar tokens. The primary goal of these guidelines is to ensure that banks implement robust risk management practices, including the detection and monitoring of potential risks, such as those related to cybersecurity threats and illicit financial activities. State member banks involved in dollar token activities will also face ongoing supervisory assessments and heightened observation.

Novel Activities Supervision Program

In addition to these guidelines, the Federal Reserve introduced the Novel Activities Supervision Program, designed to oversee unconventional activities conducted by banking institutions. This program covers areas like crypto-assets, distributed ledger technology (DLT), and technology-driven collaborations with nonbank entities in providing financial services. The program’s purpose is to complement existing supervisory procedures and enhance the oversight of technology-oriented activities.

The Federal Reserve stated, “The primary aim of the novel activities supervision program is to promote the advantages of financial innovation while concurrently acknowledging and effectively addressing potential risks to ensure the stability and security of the banking system.”

Congressional Criticism

However, on Monday, members of Congress expressed criticism of both the Federal Reserve’s guidelines and the Novel Activities Supervision Program. Representatives Patrick McHenry, French Hill, and Bill Huizenga, all from the Republican party, sent a joint letter to Jerome Powell, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, expressing their disapproval. They argued that these measures could be seen as circumventing Congress’s efforts to establish a regulatory framework for stablecoins. They emphasized the importance of a stable regulatory environment for payment stablecoins and the broader digital asset landscape, providing safeguards for consumers and clarity for market participants.

Stablecoin Launch by PayPal

Parallel to these developments, the launch of a stablecoin by PayPal raised concerns among lawmakers. Maxine Waters, a leading Democratic Representative on the House Financial Services Committee, expressed reservations about PayPal’s decision. Waters stressed the necessity of federal supervision and enforcement to protect consumers and maintain financial stability.

The Ongoing Debate

The differing perspectives on stablecoins within the House Financial Services Committee highlight the ongoing debate surrounding the regulation of cryptocurrencies and the need for a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets. While some legislators see stablecoins as a promising aspect of the contemporary payment system, others underscore the importance of clear regulations and robust consumer safeguards. Establishing regulations for stablecoins is a critical step towards striking a balance between encouraging innovation and upholding financial stability.


The Federal Reserve’s recent guidelines and the Novel Activities Supervision Program have sparked controversy among members of Congress regarding the regulation of stablecoins. While the Federal Reserve aims to ensure the safety and security of the banking system, some legislators fear that these actions may hinder their efforts to establish a regulatory framework for stablecoins. The ongoing debate underscores the importance of finding a balance between innovation and regulation in the rapidly evolving world of digital assets.s


Leave a Reply

Most Popular

Recent Comments

%d bloggers like this: